Tsallaka zuwa abin da ke ciki
Sabīl
Muwatta Malik

Lamba 1152

Lamba 1152Littafi na 29, lamba 3
وَحَدَّثَنِي عَنْ مَالِكٍ، عَنْ يَحْيَى بْنِ سَعِيدٍ، عَنْ أَبِي بَكْرِ بْنِ حَزْمٍ، أَنَّ عُمَرَ بْنَ عَبْدِ الْعَزِيزِ، قَالَ لَهُ الْبَتَّةُ مَا يَقُولُ النَّاسُ فِيهَا قَالَ أَبُو بَكْرٍ فَقُلْتُ لَهُ كَانَ أَبَانُ بْنُ عُثْمَانَ يَجْعَلُهَا وَاحِدَةً ‏.‏ فَقَالَ عُمَرُ بْنُ عَبْدِ الْعَزِيزِ لَوْ كَانَ الطَّلاَقُ أَلْفًا مَا أَبْقَتِ الْبَتَّةُ مِنْهَا شَيْئًا مَنْ قَالَ الْبَتَّةَ فَقَدْ رَمَى الْغَايَةَ الْقُصْوَى ‏.‏
Yahya related to me from Malik from Yahya ibn Said from Abu Bakr ibn Hazm thatUmar ibn Abd al-Aziz had asked him what people said about the 'irrevocable' divorce, and Abu Bakr had replied that Aban ibn Uthman had clarified that it was declared only once. Umar ibn Abd al- Aziz said, "Even if divorce had to be declared a thousand times, the'irrevocable' would use them all up. A person who says, 'irrevocably' has cast the furthest limit
Darajoji a cikin tushen
  • Maqtu SahihSalim al-Hilali

A ƙarƙashin kowace ruwaya akwai fassarar tarin bayanan kansa, an nuna ta yadda take. Ba ta ambaci sunan mai fassara ba, ba a tabbatar da haƙƙoƙinta ba, kuma babu wanda ya kwatanta ta da Larabcin; wasu ruwayoyin ba su da ita. Larabcin shi ne rubutun. Tarin bayanan ba shi da fassarar wannan littafi a wannan harshe, don haka ana nuna Turancin.

Littafi na 29 · Divorce

Rubutun Larabci, lambobi, sunayen littattafai da darajoji ana nuna su daidai yadda suke a cikin wani buɗaɗɗen tarin bayanai (hadith-api). Sabīl bai tabbatar da daidaitonsa ko haƙƙoƙinsa ba tukuna, kuma ba a fara bitar malamai a kansa ba. Kafin lokacin, ku kwatanta ruwaya da bugaggen littafi kafin ku dogara da ita.