Ruka hadi kwenye maudhui
Sabīl
Muwatta’ Malik

Na. 1152

Na. 1152Kitabu cha 29, na. 3
وَحَدَّثَنِي عَنْ مَالِكٍ، عَنْ يَحْيَى بْنِ سَعِيدٍ، عَنْ أَبِي بَكْرِ بْنِ حَزْمٍ، أَنَّ عُمَرَ بْنَ عَبْدِ الْعَزِيزِ، قَالَ لَهُ الْبَتَّةُ مَا يَقُولُ النَّاسُ فِيهَا قَالَ أَبُو بَكْرٍ فَقُلْتُ لَهُ كَانَ أَبَانُ بْنُ عُثْمَانَ يَجْعَلُهَا وَاحِدَةً ‏.‏ فَقَالَ عُمَرُ بْنُ عَبْدِ الْعَزِيزِ لَوْ كَانَ الطَّلاَقُ أَلْفًا مَا أَبْقَتِ الْبَتَّةُ مِنْهَا شَيْئًا مَنْ قَالَ الْبَتَّةَ فَقَدْ رَمَى الْغَايَةَ الْقُصْوَى ‏.‏
Yahya related to me from Malik from Yahya ibn Said from Abu Bakr ibn Hazm thatUmar ibn Abd al-Aziz had asked him what people said about the 'irrevocable' divorce, and Abu Bakr had replied that Aban ibn Uthman had clarified that it was declared only once. Umar ibn Abd al- Aziz said, "Even if divorce had to be declared a thousand times, the'irrevocable' would use them all up. A person who says, 'irrevocably' has cast the furthest limit
Madaraja katika chanzo
  • Maqtu SahihSalim al-Hilali

Chini ya kila hadithi kuna tafsiri ya seti ya data yenyewe, ikionyeshwa kama ilivyo. Haitaji mfasiri, haki zake hazijathibitishwa, na hakuna aliyeilinganisha na Kiarabu; baadhi ya hadithi hazina tafsiri. Kiarabu ndiyo maandishi yenyewe. Seti ya data haina tafsiri ya kitabu hiki katika lugha hii, hivyo Kiingereza kinaonyeshwa.

Kitabu cha 29 · Divorce

Maandishi ya Kiarabu, namba, majina ya vitabu na madaraja vinaonyeshwa sawasawa na vilivyo katika seti ya data iliyo wazi (hadith-api). Sabīl bado haijathibitisha usahihi wake wala haki zake, na uhakiki wake wa wanazuoni haujaanza. Hadi hapo, linganisha hadithi na toleo lililochapishwa kabla ya kuitegemea.